You’ve probably heard the old adage “a picture is worth a thousand words,” right? When conveying information, ideas, and concepts, showing rather than telling can be more efficient, and more effective. This is especially true when it comes to mathematics.
Look at the picture above. There is no language or symbolism, and yet it’s conveying something very clear: 4 + 3 = 7.
Despite the fact that math education in this country relies almost exclusively on language-heavy methods of teaching and learning, research has shown again and again that a visual approach to conveying mathematical concepts can be highly effective. And with new innovations in technology, we can go beyond a purely visual approach, by showcasing ideas using spatial temporal methods that provide an even deeper level of impact.
Spatial-Temporal Reasoning Defined
Spatial-temporal reasoning and its impact on learning has been a core area of focus for MIND Research Institute since before the organization was even founded in 1998. Dr. Gordon Shaw explored the possibilities in his neuroscience research back in the 1970s. Dr. Shaw, Dr. Mark Bodner, and Dr. Matthew Peterson came together years later to further explore an approach to teaching math the way children learn—through spatial temporal patterns and experiences.
But what does spatial-temporal reasoning mean, exactly? Spatial-temporal reasoning involves transforming, relating, and comparing physical and mental images in space and time.
One of the ways to understand spatial-temporal reasoning is to think about how it relates to language-analytic reasoning. In his 2000 book "Keeping Mozart in Mind," Dr. Gordon Shaw described the difference between language-analytic and spatial temporal reasoning:
"Language-analytic reasoning, for example, is more involved when we solve equations and obtain a quantitative result. Spatial-temporal reasoning, on the other hand, is involved in chess when we have to think ahead several moves."
Designing Spatial Temporal Models
Spatial temporal models are a powerful method of conveying ideas. What makes something a spatial-temporal model?
Spatial: displayed in space
Temporal: over time
Everyone’s brain has an innate ability to visualize and manipulate images through time and space. Conveying information in this format taps into one of our brain’s innate ways of receiving information.
When it comes to education, there’s a massive opportunity for utilizing these tools to convey ideas, particularly for areas that tend to be more abstract. Given the misconceptions that occur in many math classes, math is a great candidate for this approach. Almost all math ideas can be more accurately and efficiently communicated through a concrete approach first, whether it be through physical tools, virtual models, or pen and paper.
Spatial-temporal models are a highly powerful approach, especially when one can use the digital world to showcase things that would be impossible to demonstrate in the physical world. Here, the laws of physics can be bent, allowing us to teach and convey a whole new range of ideas.
Our ST Math program employs a unique, patented learning model that leverages the brain's innate spatial-temporal reasoning ability to solve mathematical problems. ST Math starts by teaching the foundational concepts with interactive spatial temporal models visually, then connects the ideas to the symbols and language. With visual learning, students are better equipped to tackle unfamiliar math problems, recognize patterns, and build conceptual understanding. Without language barriers, the problem is accessible to all students, regardless of skill level or language background.
Benefits of a Spatial-Temporal Approach
When it comes to learning outcomes, spatial-temporal models offer clear advantages over the traditional, more language-heavy approach to teaching mathematical concepts.
Leveraging the Way the Brain Learns
By accessing the students’ innate spatial-temporal reasoning ability, we are teaching math concepts in a way that aligns to how our brains learn. Combining a visual approach with spatial-temporal models and informative feedback provides a learning experience that deepens conceptual understanding.
Removing Language as a Barrier
Language and symbols are an unnecessary complication when we are trying to build a foundational understanding of math concepts. By removing language from the process, students can focus on mastering concepts. Language and symbols are then introduced in a way that reinforces that conceptual understanding.
Minimizing Demands on Working Memory
As stated above, by removing language and symbols, students can dedicate all of their working memory to solving the math problems before them. They are focusing their efforts exactly where they need to be.
For our ST Math program, we’ve designed a suite of hundreds of ST models, wrapped within games, allowing students to take a problem-based approach to interacting with these models. And with this approach, we are having a massive impact on the mathematics learning of students across the country.
To learn more about ST Math, explore some of our games, and request a demo, you can head over to stmath.com!
Shaw, Gordon. (1978). Space-time correlations of neuronal firing related to memory storage capacity. Brain research bulletin. 3. 107-13. 10.1016/0361-9230(78)90035-7. Hu, Wenjie & Bodner, Mark & Jones, Edward & Peterson, Matthew & Shaw, Gordon & CA, Costa. (1994). Dynamics of Innate Spatial-Temporal Learning Process: Data Driven Education Results Identify Universal Barriers to Learning. Shaw, G & Bodner, Mark. (1999). Music Enhances Spatial-Temporal Reasoning: Towards a Neurophysiological Basis Using EEG. Clinical EEG (electroencephalography). 30. 151-5. Peterson, Matthew & Balzarini, Doreen & Bodner, Mark & Jones, Edward & Phillips, Tiffany & Richardson, Debra & Shaw, Gordon. (2004). Innate spatial–temporal reasoning and the identification of genius. Neurological research. 26. 2-8. 10.1179/016164104773026471.